Loading ecosystem intelligence…
Loading ecosystem intelligence…
Preparing project insights…

Largest decentralized exchange on Base.
Launched: Not Currently Available — no genesis date on record with CoinGecko
AI Intelligence
Intelligence
Uniswap is a Dex project, live across 5 chains. Verified in the Base Radar registry, it currently shows a Health score of 100/100 with high confidence from 5 live data sources. It currently holds $486.14M in TVL. Its codebase is open-source and actively indexed on GitHub. Risk registers as low across 7 assessed factors. Near-term momentum reads cooling off.
Overall Rating
Suitable for Deeper Research
Eight independent scores, each with what it measures, why it matters, and the real evidence (or missing evidence) behind it — nothing here is an unexplained percentage.
Updated —Overview
Market
No verified contracts available
No verified contracts have been indexed for this project yet. Base Radar only displays manually verified contracts to ensure users always receive trusted addresses. When available, this section will include verified addresses, deployment network, and explorer links.
Governance
Activity
Whale transfers, governance, GitHub releases and commits, TVL swings, risk alerts, registry updates, discovery events, and signals, merged into one newest-first feed — no event type shown twice.
Sources
This is the underlying evidence behind the Health & Trust score above — every source this project's report checks, whether it came back live, and why any source is missing.
6 of 7 liveRelated
No token contract is configured for this project on its primary chain.
Add this project to a Watchlist to include it in AI Watch — it checks your saved watch when you open AI Workspace, it doesn't run in the background.
Bull Case
Bear Case
Watch Closely
Not yet tracked: X (Twitter) followers, Discord members, and Telegram members aren't available — X's follower-count API requires paid access, and Discord/Telegram member counts require bot-level access to each project's own server that this app doesn't have. Reddit and Medium have no provider integrated into Base Radar at all yet.
Evidence: TVL signal (+30), GitHub activity signal (+25), Trading liquidity signal (+20), 24h price momentum (-10)
Evidence: Registry verification: verified (+40), CoinGecko market data: live (+10), DexScreener trading data: live (+10), DefiLlama TVL data: live (approximate match) (+5), Base network status: live (+10), GitHub repository stats: live (+10)
Evidence: Low risk — All live data sources were fetched recently.
Evidence: Base Radar's own editorial review — see docs/PROJECT_REGISTRY.md for what verification requires.
Evidence: Derived from recent GitHub commit activity in the Risk Analysis.
Evidence: 4 of 13 tracked community/official links are configured for this project.
Evidence: Derived from live DexScreener-aggregated liquidity depth in the Risk Analysis.
Evidence: 0 active proposals out of 199 tracked on Snapshot.
TL;DR DUNI owns the three Gauntlet-curated Morpho Vaults V2 behind Uniswap Earn: uniUSDC, uniUSDT and uniETH, all on Ethereum mainnet. Gauntlet has upgraded its signing infrastructure and needs to swap out some wallets configured in the Sentinel role on vault deployment. setIsSentinel, the function used to adjust addresses granted the Sentinel role, is owner-gated and the Owner is Uniswap governance’s mainnet Timelock. Background Uniswap Labs launched Uniswap Earn in July 2026. Consistent with past Uniswap Labs-originated protocol launches, the ownership roles on the smart contracts that power Uniswap Earn were assigned to Uniswap Governance. In Earn, a user deposits USDC, USDT or ETH in the Uniswap app, the deposit flows into a Morpho Vaults V2 instance, and Gauntlet curates the allocation. In the run up to launch, Gauntlet deployed the three vaults and transferred ownership to DUNI’s Timelock address. Morpho Vaults V2 splits control across four roles. | Role | Capabilities | Appointed by | Held on the Earn vaults by | | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | | Owner | Appoint the Curator, add and remove Sentinels, transfer ownership, set vault name and symbol. One address only. | Prior Owner, via setOwner | DUNI, via the mainnet Timelock | | Curator | Set caps and risk parameters, enable yield sources, set fees, appoint allocators. Most actions timelocked. One address only. | Owner | Gauntlet | | Allocator | Move capital between enabled yield sources, within the bounds the Curator has set. Multiple addresses allowed. | Curator | Gauntlet | | Sentinel | Lower caps, revoke pending Curator actions, pull assets out of lending markets back into the vault. Takes effect instantly. Multiple addresses allowed. | Owner | Gauntlet | The Owner has no claim on deposits and does not set risk parameters, allocations, or fees directly. Fee management sits with the Curator. Governance's leverage runs through its power to appoint and replace the Curator, which is why ownership was structured this way. Performance fee is currently zero on all three vaults. Motivation Gauntlet has upgraded the signing infrastructure it uses across the vaults it curates. Specific to Uniswap Earn vaults, this has resulted in new addresses for the Sentinel role. Specification The three vaults, all on Ethereum mainnet: | Vault | Address | | ----- | ----- | | Uniswap USDC (uniUSDC) | 0x5B453493D2328E7F747eb2e66446eFe707728be7 | | Uniswap USDT (uniUSDT) | 0xb8274eFADB953FE9ae052D481a3FC5B6A3ceD703 | | Uniswap ETH (uniETH) | 0x98D2b241DA14c5dd848812708Eb8A1F3c5512f9d | The Owner of all three is the Timelock at 0x1a9C8182C09F50C8318d769245beA52c32BE35BC. We propose calling setIsSentinel(address,bool) six times: once to grant the role to each new Gauntlet address, and once to revoke it from each legacy address. | Vault | New Sentinel (grant) | Legacy Sentinel (revoke) | | ----- | ----- | ----- | | uniUSDC | 0xF66b884D1906F37c1692CEa63564316FF975Cd75 | 0xc3FE37DB03B5720D1684bE2e0200E0Af07853Ad9 | | uniUSDT | 0xD9b023059dfD00C2DC68C4d8d0c70BCaA30577Db | 0x2745513325d4Ce5724e5B6Fb663356C427AfdeCc | | uniETH | 0x4Ff315B873d6e5Ad8ff7fF3e17D340862762cc2f | 0xc63A00De30AeB5666a8aC3478a4D119D38058c7E | A vault can hold more than one Sentinel, so the grants and the revocations are independent actions. For every vault, the Curator stays Gauntlet, the Owner stays the Timelock, and all parameters such as caps, adapters and fees are unchanged. Onchain Proposal Spec Six transactions, all sent from the Timelock, all with value = 0. Function selector 0x920ed706. `` // uniUSDC vault: 0x5B453493D2328E7F747eb2e66446eFe707728be7 setIsSentinel(0xF66b884D1906F37c1692CEa63564316FF975Cd75, true); setIsSentinel(0xc3FE37DB03B5720D1684bE2e0200E0Af07853Ad9, false); // uniUSDT vault: 0xb8274eFADB953FE9ae052D481a3FC5B6A3ceD703 setIsSentinel(0xD9b023059dfD00C2DC68C4d8d0c70BCaA30577Db, true); setIsSentinel(0x2745513325d4Ce5724e5B6Fb663356C427AfdeCc, false); // uniETH vault: 0x98D2b241DA14c5dd848812708Eb8A1F3c5512f9d setIsSentinel(0x4Ff315B873d6e5Ad8ff7fF3e17D340862762cc2f, true); setIsSentinel(0xc63A00De30AeB5666a8aC3478a4D119D38058c7E, false); ` Raw calldata: ` 0x920ed706000000000000000000000000f66b884d1906f37c1692cea63564316ff975cd750000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 0x920ed706000000000000000000000000c3fe37db03b5720d1684be2e0200e0af07853ad90000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0x920ed706000000000000000000000000d9b023059dfd00c2dc68c4d8d0c70bcaa30577db0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 0x920ed7060000000000000000000000002745513325d4ce5724e5b6fb663356c427afdecc0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0x920ed7060000000000000000000000004ff315b873d6e5ad8ff7ff3e17d340862762cc2f0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 0x920ed706000000000000000000000000c63a00de30aeb5666a8ac3478a4d119d38058c7e0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 `` A full simulation will be available via Seatbelt alongside the onchain vote. Risks and Considerations Sentinel authority is constraining-only. Per the deployed contracts, a Sentinel can decrease relative and absolute allocation caps, revoke a timelocked Curator action, and deallocate assets. It cannot allocate, raise caps, withdraw from the vault, or change configuration. A compromised Sentinel can constrain the vault or unwind a Curator action. It cannot drain one. Morpho's own documentation rates the impact of a compromised Sentinel as minimal and lists a hot key as an acceptable setup for the role. No coverage gap. The six transactions execute together, so the new addresses are live before the old ones are removed. Precedent. While Gauntlet does not anticipate needing to swap addresses frequently, any future Sentinel rotation will run through the same process, including Gauntlet's confirmation of ownership of the addresses. Next Steps | Stage | Target | | ----- | ----- | | RFC discussion | Week of September 8, 2026 | | Snapshot temperature check | Week of September 15, 2026 | | Onchain vote | Submitted week of September 21, 2026 | | Timelock execution | Early October 2026 | Supporting Documents Morpho Vaults V2 roles and capabilities Morpho Vault V2 concept overview Morpho Vaults V2 contracts
This proposal is part of the protocol fee rollout, following proposals #93, #94, #95, #96, #99, and #100. It uses the expedited governance process approved in UNIfication, where fee parameter update proposals can bypass the RFC stage and go directly to a five-day Snapshot followed by an onchain vote. Since protocol fees went live on Ethereum mainnet in late December last year, the rollout has extended to eleven additional chains: Arbitrum, Base, OP Mainnet, Worldchain, X Layer, Soneium, Zora, Celo, BNB Chain, Polygon, and Robinhood Chain. The burn system is working as designed, with fees accumulating in TokenJars across chains. From there, searchers claim them in exchange for burning UNI by bridging it back to mainnet and sending it to the burn address. Arc is a Layer 1 built by Circle for the world's financial markets, real-time money movement, and agentic economic activity, with mainnet going live September 16, 2026. Uniswap was live on Arc from launch, with v2, v3, v4, and UniswapX all deployed. This proposal: Extends the infrastructure for collecting and burning protocol fees to Arc Enables v2, v3, and v4 protocol fees on Arc Implementation Details Governance path. Cross-chain governance messages are sent from the protocol's Timelock to the UniswapWormholeMessageSender on Ethereum and executed on Arc by UniswapWormholeReceiver. As is the case on Polygon and BNB Chain, the UniswapWormholeMessageReceiver holds the feeToSetter role on the Uniswapv2Factory and the owner role on Uniswapv3Factory and v4's PoolManager prior to turning on fees. Burn path. UNI on Arc is a synthetic token under Wormhole's Native Token Transfer system (NTT). This is a 'lock, mint, and burn' system where canonical UNI is locked on Ethereum so a synthetic UNI can be minted on a foreign chain using Wormhole's NTT infrastructure. More details can be found in the spec here. Protocol fees generated on Arc burn UNI on mainnet using the Tokenjar and Releaser smart contracts. As on other chains, a searcher pays synthetic UNI on Arc to claim the TokenJar's accumulated fees. The releaser, WormholeReleaser, sends that synthetic UNI to be burned by the NttManager on Arc, which emits a Wormhole message. The message is forwarded to the NttManager on Ethereum, which sends the corresponding canonical UNI to the burn address. This is the same releaser and the same path already in production on Polygon and BNB Chain. The AMM and governance message passing contracts have been deployed and are detailed in the table below. The protocol fee infrastructure contracts will be deployed in the coming days and added to the table before the onchain vote goes live. Implementation details for the v4 fee system are in the v4 fee activation temp check. v2 and v3 protocol fee levels are the same as on all other chains where fees are live. See a breakdown here. Proposal Spec If passed, the Arc Fee Activation proposal will execute two sets of calls on Ethereum. The first registers Arc with the existing mainnet NTT system, setting Arc's WormholeTransceiver and NttManager as peers of their Ethereum counterparts. On Polygon and BNB Chain this step was permissionless, because the mainnet NTT contracts were being deployed at the same time and had not yet been handed to the Timelock. Those contracts now exist and are governance owned, so registering a new chain against them requires an onchain vote. `` WORMHOLETRANSCEIVER.setWormholePeer(ARCWORMHOLECHAINID, ARCWORMHOLETRANSCEIVER) NTTMANAGER.setPeer(ARCWORMHOLECHAINID, ARCNTTMANAGER, 18, 0) ` Note that WORMHOLECHAINID is a parameter specific to Wormhole, not to be confused with EVM Chain IDs. More details here. The second call sends the fee activation calls to Arc: ` WORMHOLESENDER.sendMessage(targets, values, datas, UNISWAPWORMHOLERECEIVER, ARCWORMHOLECHAINID) ` encoding: ` V2FACTORY.setFeeTo(TOKENJAR) V3FACTORY.setOwner(V3OPENFEEADAPTER) V4POOLMANAGER.setProtocolFeeController(V4FEEADAPTER) `` Once executed on Arc, these set the fee collector of UniswapV2Factory to TokenJar, transfer ownership of UniswapV3Factory to V3OpenFeeAdapter, and set the v4 PoolManager's protocol fee controller to V4FeeAdapter. RELEVANT ADDRESSES: | Name | Network | Address | Description | |----|----|----|----| | V2_FACTORY | Arc | 0x89e5DB8B5aA49aA85AC63f691524311AEB649eba | Uniswap V2 Factory | | V3_FACTORY | Arc | 0xf0db7b58379503491d857dB50AC9ece64c653918 | Uniswap V3 Factory | | V4POOLMANAGER | Arc | 0x8366a39CC670B4001A1121B8F6A443A643e40951 | Uniswap V4 Pool Manager | | UNISWAPWORMHOLERECEIVER | Arc | 0xbCA30b5429935205037069cF5b8A165F55d05a75 | Governance owned Wormhole receiver | | TOKEN_JAR | Arc | TBD | Fee Collector | | V3OPENFEE_ADAPTER | Arc | TBD | Uniswap V3 Fee Adapter | | V4FEEADAPTER | Arc | TBD | Uniswap V4 Fee Adapter | | V4FEEPOLICY | Arc | TBD | Uniswap V4 Fee Policy | | RELEASER | Arc | TBD | WormholeReleaser | | NTT_MANAGER | Arc | TBD | Wormhole NTT Manager | | WORMHOLE_TRANSCEIVER | Arc | TBD | Wormhole Transceiver | | SYNTHETICNTTUNI | Arc | TBD | Synthetic UNI | | WORMHOLE_SENDER | Ethereum | 0xf5F4496219F31CDCBa6130B5402873624585615a | Wormhole Sender | | NTT_MANAGER | Ethereum | 0x6569925Aac77D6B8Bb085F31F9828ff80D5a0c44 | Wormhole NTT Manager | | WORMHOLE_TRANSCEIVER | Ethereum | 0x7597C40Fd3df66b750C14ad4D90524e247499011 | Wormhole Transceiver | Next Steps / Timeline Snapshot: Sep 18-23, 2026 Onchain vote: Following successful Snapshot
Summary GFX Labs/Oku Trade proposes deploying Uniswap V4 on four EVM-compatible networks: Sei, Etherlink, Pharos, and 0G. These deployments expand V4's footprint, generate protocol fees across new chains, and give hook developers new environments to build on. With Morpho deployed on these networks, the addition of V4 provides a playground for unique financial applications to be developed. V3 is deployed on all chains and acts as the main liquidity hub for the networks. No treasury spend is requested — GFX Labs covers all costs. --- Background Since 2022, GFX Labs has deployed Uniswap V3 to 30+ EVM chains through Oku Trade, funding and executing the majority of deployments independently. With Oku's V4 interface complete, we are positioned to continue this expansion. This proposal covers four chains where the community, liquidity environment, or emerging technical primitives create meaningful opportunities for the Uniswap DAO. --- Upside for the DAO The four networks in this proposal collectively represent a meaningful and growing source of protocol fee revenue for the DAO. Sei recorded $1.5B in DEX volume in Q1 2026 with TVL holding steadily above $50M. With limited competition outside of Sei's native DEX Saphyre, V4 is well positioned to carve out meaningful market share. Pharos adds further upside — with mainnet recently live and over $100M committed to RWAs on the network, V4 has a clear opportunity to become the primary trading protocol on a chain purpose-built for institutional liquidity. Applying a 5bps protocol fee across anticipated V4 pool activity at common 5bps and 30bps LP fee tiers, even conservative volume assumptions produce meaningful accrual. If V4 captures 15-20% of Sei's quarterly DEX volume, that represents roughly $300M flowing through V4 pools and an estimated $150,000 in quarterly protocol fees from a single chain at current activity levels. With Uniswap's fee switch now active following the UNIfication proposal, every incremental deployment directly contributes to protocol revenue, making low-cost (zero in this case), high-conviction expansions like this the most efficient path to growing the DAO's fee base. !V4draftimage|690x392 Proposed Deployments Sei Sei is a Layer-1 blockchain built specifically for trading and financial applications. With over $300M in minted stablecoins, predominantly through Ondo's multi-chain U.S. treasury product, Sei has established a strong and growing foothold in EVM DeFi. The network's ongoing full EVM migration plan aims to enhance network performance and further position itself as the backbone for institutional-grade onchain infrastructure. Etherlink (Tezos EVM) Etherlink is the EVM-compatible Layer 2 of the Tezos ecosystem, backed by the Tezos Foundation, one of crypto's most established and consistently funded foundations since 2014. Etherlink has developed a notable presence in novel onchain RWA markets, specifically for metals, as exemplified by tokenized uranium (xU308), which can be leveraged as collateral for USDC-backed loans on Morpho. With a focus on bringing unique assets onchain, V4 adds another layer to Etherlink's growing suite of financial markets. Etherlink is currently undergoing a rebranding to TezosX - a consolidation effort to strengthen and reunify the Tezos brand and act as the primary EVM DeFi environment for the network. Pharos Pharos is an EVM Layer 1 focused on RWA tokenization, high-throughput DeFi, and institutional-grade infrastructure. Built and incubated by Ant Group with over $50M in raised capital from investors including Sumitomo, Chainlink, and Flow Traders, Pharos heads into its 2026 mainnet after an exceptional testnet that processed 4.3B transactions across 200 million wallets, with its inaugural RWA vault reaching $50M capacity within days of opening. With Morpho live on the network, combining V4’s programmable liquidity layer gives Pharos the most capable DeFi stack available for institutions looking to move, lend, and trade tokenized assets in a compliant environment at scale. 0G 0G is a modular Layer 1 built for AI and autonomous applications, backed by $290M in funding, with mainnet launching in September 2025. It offers decentralized storage with 2 GB/s throughput and a data availability layer that is significantly faster and cheaper than Ethereum's. As AI agents and autonomous DeFi protocols grow in prevalence, they'll need reliable onchain liquidity infrastructure. V4's hooks to enable dynamic fees, TWAMM, and programmable pool behaviors are a strong fit for AI-driven strategies that require more nuanced market infrastructure than standard AMMs offer. Deploying V4 on 0G positions Uniswap as the default DEX for the emerging agentic economy. 0G is currently incentivizing three V3 pools with $40,000 $0G distributed monthly. --- Benefits to the DAO More protocol fee revenue. Four additional chains means four more sources of fees accruing to the DAO as V4 adoption grows. Expanded V4 footprint. Each deployment grows the total addressable market for Uniswap — more users, more LPs, more developers interacting with V4 infrastructure. No cost. GFX Labs handles all technical deployment, maintenance, and Oku interface support. No treasury expenditure, no token subsidies. --- Requested Action GFX Labs requests that the Uniswap DAO: Grant GFX Labs a Uniswap V4 BSL This proposal continues Oku's role as a reliable execution partner for the DAO — handling the operational lift of the V4 expansion so the DAO can capture the upside without the overhead. More chains, more hooks, more fee generation. We welcome feedback on the networks, deployment process, or integration timelines. — GFX Labs / Oku.Trade
This proposal is part of the protocol fee rollout, following proposals #93, #94, #95, and #96. It uses the expedited governance process approved in UNIfication, where fee parameter update proposals can bypass the RFC stage and go directly to a five-day Snapshot followed by an onchain vote. Since protocol fees went live on Ethereum mainnet in late December last year, the rollout has extended to ten additional chains: Arbitrum, Base, OP Mainnet, Worldchain, X Layer, Soneium, Zora, Celo, BNB Chain, and Polygon. The burn system is working as designed, with fees accumulating in TokenJars across chains. From there, searchers claim them in exchange for burning UNI by bridging it back to mainnet and sending it to the burn address. Uniswap launched on Robinhood Chain at the chain's July 1, 2026 mainnet debut, with v2, v3, and v4 all live. As of July 10, the deployments have crossed $1b of cumulative swap volume. This proposal: Extends the infrastructure for collecting and burning protocol fees to Robinhood Chain Enables v2, v3, and v4 protocol fees on Robinhood Chain Implementation Details Fees on Robinhood Chain will be routed to the TokenJar on that chain. UNI burned on Robinhood Chain is bridged back to Ethereum mainnet and sent to the burn address. Robinhood Chain is an Arbitrum Orbit chain, so this proposal reuses the pattern from the Arbitrum One activation in proposal 94. Governance path. Same as Arbitrum One: cross-chain governance messages are delivered as retryable tickets through Robinhood Chain's Inbox contract on Ethereum and executed on Robinhood Chain by the L2 alias of the governance Timelock. The aliased Timelock already controls both factories and the v4 PoolManager on Robinhood Chain (it is the v2 factory's feeToSetter and the owner of the v3 factory and the PoolManager), so no ownership migration is required. Burn path. The releaser, ArbitrumOrbitResourceFirepit, is the Arbitrum One firepit generalized for Orbit chains. A searcher pays bridged UNI on Robinhood Chain to claim the TokenJar's accumulated fees, and the contract withdraws that UNI to the burn address on mainnet through the canonical gateway. As on Arbitrum One, the withdrawal finalizes on mainnet after Robinhood Chain's challenge period. The TokenJar, Releaser, V3OpenFeeAdapter, V4FeeAdapter, and V4FeePolicy will be deployed ahead of the onchain votes, with ownership verified against the aliased Timelock. This post will be updated with those addresses when they've been deployed and a link to the repo containing the contracts and deployment scripts once it has been merged. Implementation details for the v4 fee system are in the v4 fee activation temp check. v2 and v3 protocol fee levels are the same as on all other chains where fees are live, see breakdown here. Proposal Spec If passed, the Robinhood Fee Activation proposal will execute two calls, each creating a retryable ticket in Robinhood Chain's Inbox on Ethereum. RH_INBOX.createRetryableTicket(...) x2 One call will encode: V2FACTORY.setFeeTo(TOKENJAR) The other will encode: V3FACTORY.setOwner(V3OPENFEEADAPTER) Once executed on Robinhood Chain, they set the fee collector of UniswapV2Factory to TokenJar and transfer ownership of UniswapV3Factory to V3OpenFeeAdapter. Robinhood's v4 activation will be included in the V4 Fee Activation (Part 1) proposal described below. Matching the spec of the v4 fee activation temp check, and delivered through the same retryable ticket path, it will encode: V4POOLMANAGER.setProtocolFeeController(V4FEEADAPTER) RELEVANT ADDRESSES: | Name | Network | Address | Description | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | V2_FACTORY | Robinhood Chain | 0x8bcEaA40B9AcdfAedF85AdF4FF01F5Ad6517937f | Uniswap V2 Factory | | V3_FACTORY | Robinhood Chain | 0x1f7d7550B1b028f7571E69A784071F0205FD2EfA | Uniswap V3 Factory | | V4POOLMANAGER | Robinhood Chain | 0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951 | Uniswap V4 Pool Manager | | L2GATEWAYROUTER | Robinhood Chain | 0x1E324B9316138CA9a73F960213621AD1aaf01B89 | Canonical L2 Gateway Router | | ALIASED_TIMELOCK | Robinhood Chain | 0x2BAD8182C09F50c8318d769245beA52C32BE46CD | L2 alias of the governance Timelock | | RH_INBOX | Ethereum | 0x1A07cc4BD17E0118BdB54D70990D2158AbAD7a2D | Robinhood Chain Delayed Inbox | | TOKEN_JAR | Robinhood Chain | TBD | Fee Collector | | V3OPENFEE_ADAPTER | Robinhood Chain | TBD | Uniswap V3 Fee Adapter | | V4FEEADAPTER | Robinhood Chain | TBD | Uniswap V4 Fee Adapter (protocolFeeController) | | V4FEEPOLICY | Robinhood Chain | TBD | Uniswap V4 Fee Policy | | RELEASER | Robinhood Chain | TBD | ArbitrumOrbitResourceFirepit (searcher burn) | | UNI | Robinhood Chain | TBD | Bridged UNI | Onchain Execution This Snapshot covers v2, v3, and v4 fees on Robinhood Chain, but onchain execution will be split across three proposals. A separate Snapshot to enable v4 fees on the eleven chains where v2/v3 fees are already live concludes this weekend. The v4 activation is the same call on every chain (set the PoolManager's protocolFeeController to the V4FeeAdapter), so it is faster and safer to batch the v4 activations together and keep Robinhood's v2/v3 calls on their own: 1. Robinhood Fee Activation: the two calls specced above 2. V4 Fee Activation (Part 1): Ethereum, Base, Robinhood, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon 3. V4 Fee Activation (Part 2): Celo, Soneium, X Layer, World Chain, Zora Robinhood Fee Activation and V4 Part 1 will go onchain first, with Part 2 following once a proposer wallet frees up. Robinhood's v4 fees will be enabled through Part 1, contingent on both Snapshots passing. Next Steps / Timeline Snapshot begins: Jul 10, 2026 Snapshot ends: Jul 15, 2026 Onchain votes: Robinhood Fee Activation and V4 Fee Activation (Part 1) following the Snapshots, per standard governance cadence; V4 Fee Activation (Part 2) to follow
Summary This proposal continues the protocol fee rollout approved in UNIfication, following proposals #93, #94, #95, and #96. It uses the expedited governance process where fee parameter update proposals go directly to a five-day Snapshot followed by an onchain vote. Protocol fees are now live across all v2 and v3 pools on 11 chains - Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Celo, OP Mainnet, Soneium, X Layer, Worldchain, Zora, BNB Chain, and Polygon. Last month, the protocol set a record burning 186,000 UNI in one day. Below we introduce a system for v4 protocol fees and propose to activate it on a subset of v4 pools on these same chains. --- Implementation Details v4's hook architecture requires a different approach to fee activation than v2 or v3. v2 pools have a single LP fee tier and are charged a static fee. v3 has several LP fee tiers, each charged a static fee. Hooks mean v4 has potentially infinite distinct LP fee tiers, and a pool's fees can change dynamically from one block to the next. To manage this, we propose a V4 Fee Controller system where governance sets rules that let a dedicated contract compute the fee for any pool on demand, rather than setting a fee on each individual pool. The system splits across two contracts: V4FeePolicy. Given any pool, it computes the fee from rules defined by governance. This is the contract governance calls to enable and adjust the protocol fee, and it can be swapped out later if the logic for setting fees needs to evolve. V4FeeAdapter. Enforces governance overrides, so if governance has set a per-pool override, that override wins and the policy is skipped. Otherwise the adapter applies the policy's fee, pushes it to the pool, and collects the proceeds to the TokenJar. V4FeePolicy determines a pool’s fee in two steps. First it sorts the pool into a family. A pool’s family is determined by its characteristics, e.g. whether it has a hook, whether it uses the PoolManager’s native swap math, whether it charges dynamic swap fees, et cetera. A pool’s family is identified by a flag, which is stored on the hook smart contract. Hook developers can opt their pools into a family via assigning it a specific flag. Governance can also assign a hook to a family directly via a vote. Once it determines the pool's family, the policy then resolves the fee, applying the rules below, going in order from most specific to least: 1. a per-pair fee, if governance has set one for that token pair in that family 2. otherwise the family's own fee (defined by governance as a default or curve) 3. otherwise a global default for anything still unclassified With this system, governance manages a handful of rules and overrides instead of an unbounded list of pools, any fee is computed deterministically and can be inspected onchain, and the policy itself is replaceable if governance later wants to change how pools are categorized. This proposal activates fees on three pool families: Static fee pools: These are pools without hooks. The protocol fee for these pools is set via a curve targeting a proportion of each pool's LP fee. For a description of this curve, please see the appendix below. CCA Pools: These are pools launched after a Continuous Clearing Auction. The LBPHook and pools resulting from previous auctions will be opted into the same curve as static pools. Aggregator hook pools: These are pools whose hooks integrate external liquidity venues into the v4 routing graph. The protocol fee for the aggregator hook family is a flat fee with overrides for specific pair types. To maintain the option of charging more on this external flow than the v4 PoolManager’s hard cap of 10bps, aggregator hooks will multiply their assigned fees by 25, allowing for a cap of 250bps. After the multiplier is applied, the resulting fee for aggregator hooks will be: - For all chains other than Base: - Family Default: 10bp - Select Stable Pairs: 3bp - For Base: - Family Default: 3bp - Select Stable Pairs: 1bp This proposal does not enable the protocol fee for any pools other than those in the Families mentioned above. Fees will flow to TokenJar on each chain. UNI burned on L2s and alt-L1s will be bridged back to Ethereum mainnet and sent to 0xdead. --- Onchain Proposal Spec Pre-proposal (to be completed by Uniswap Labs prior to an onchain vote) Deploy V4FeeAdapter and V4FeePolicy contracts on all chains where the v2 and v3 protocol fees are currently enabled (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Celo, OP Mainnet, Soneium, X Layer, Worldchain, Zora, BNB Chain, and Polygon). Configure V4FeePolicy contracts with the native math protocol fee curve, CCA Hook and aggregator hook family fee logic described above These contracts can be found here, and this post will be updated with addresses and explorer links when they have been deployed. In this proposal (executed if the vote passes): Set the V4FeeAdapter as the ProtocolFeeController on the PoolManager on each chain --- Next Steps / Timeline Snapshot: July 7-12, 2026 Onchain vote: Starting the week of July 13, 2026 Please note that because of GovernorBravo’s limit of 10 actions per proposal, there will be two separate onchain votes posted in parallel to accommodate all chains. --- Appendix - Static Fee Curve The V4 Fee Controller allows fee setting using discrete LP fee tier ranges. Each range has a floor, and the next range sets the ceiling. For each range, governance sets two inputs: alpha which is the constant. This is the starting fee for that range. beta which is the scaling factor. This is how fast the fee grows within that range. The growth always starts from the floor of the range. Inside any range, the fee is: alpha + beta \* (lpFee - floor).The output is floored to the nearest 0.01bp increment, consistent with v4's minimum fee resolution. | Range (bps) | Floor | Alpha (bps) | Beta (bps) | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | 0 - 0.03 | 0 | 0.01 | 0 | | 0.03 - 0.75 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 19/72 | | 0.75 - 1 | 0.75 | 0.2 | 0.2 | | 1 - 3.75 | 1 | 0.25 | 3/11 | | 3.75 - 5 | 3.75 | 1 | 0.2 | | 5 - 25 | 5 | 1.25 | 11/80 | | 25 - 55 | 25 | 4 | 0.2 | | > 55 | 55 | 10 | 0 | This results in the following fees at the following points. | LP Fee (bps) | Protocol Fee (bps) | | :--- | :--- | | 0.03 | 0.01 | | .75 | 0.20 | | 1 | 0.25 | | 3.75 | 1 | | 5 | 1.25 | | 25 | 4 | | 30 | 5 | | 83.34 | 10 | | 100 | 10 |
Project identity, category, tags, and verification status — Base Radar's own editorial registry, always available.
Price, market cap, and 24h volume, pulled live from CoinGecko's public API.
24/30 requests remaining · Updated —On-chain DEX pair price, volume, and liquidity data from DexScreener.
29/30 requests remaining · Updated —Total value locked (TVL), sourced live from DefiLlama's protocol data.
28/30 requests remaining · Updated —Stars, forks, open issues, and release activity, sourced live from the GitHub API.
Authenticated · 4735/5000 per hour · Updated —Live gas price and network status, read directly from the Base RPC.
27/30 requests remaining · Updated —No blockscoutAddress or Base contract configured on this project Normally provides: On-chain contract and network activity, read directly from Base's Blockscout explorer.
Last 15 Days2 Governance
Rotate Sentinel Addresses on the DUNI-Owned Uniswap Earn Vaults — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Protocol Fee Expansion: Arc — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] - Four for V4 — Failed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Protocol Fee Expansion: Robinhood Chain — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Activate v4 Protocol Fees — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] - Update Crosschain Governance Parameters for Avalanche, MegaETH, Soneium, and X Layer — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Protocol Fee Expansion: Three More Chains — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Return 12.5M Delegated Tokens to the Governance Timelock — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[RFC] Governance Process Upgrade: Establishing a Statute of Limitations for Temperature Checks — Failed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Protocol Fee Expansion: Eight More Chains and Remaining Mainnet V3 Pools — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Strategic Renewal of Gnosis, Linea, and Mantle Deployments — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—UNIfication — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Community Proposal Factory — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Grow Uniswap on Plasma — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Treasury Delegation Round 2 Elections — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—GLI — Incentivized Delegation Vaults — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—GLI — Treasury delegation Round 2 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Launching Uniswap v3 on Ronin with co-incentives — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Establish Uniswap Governance as “DUNI,” a Wyoming DUNA — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 4 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK] - Etherlink Co-incentives Proposal — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Unichain - USDS and sUSDS Co-Incentives Growth Management Plan — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Trial run a Technical Advisory Board (TAB) — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Accountability Committee S4 Elections — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Four Chains for Analytics Hub for Uniswap’s Revitalization and Growth Program — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Analytics Hub for Uniswap’s Revitalization and Growth Program — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK] Scaling V4 and Supporting Unichain — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check/Revised] Treasury Delegation Round 2 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Approved Budgets Rebalancing (S4) — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—UAC Renewal S4 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK] Establish Uniswap v4 Licensing Process — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK] BoB Uniswap v3 Incentives Package — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Treasury Delegation Round 2 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Saga Uniswap v3 Liquidity Incentives — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Unichain and Uniswap v4 Liquidity Incentives — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Uniswap Unleashed — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 3 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Incentive Package for Sonic (Formerly Fantom) — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Discretionary Budget from UAC for Co-Incentive Campaigns — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK] Metal L2: Bridging TradFi and DeFi Through Uniswap V3 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK] Scale Uniswap Liquidity on Celo — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] - Adopt The SEAL Safe Harbor Agreement — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK] Uniswap DAO Principles — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—🚀 Big News! Uniswap Just Voted to Supercharge the $gSTG Distribution in Phase 1! — Failed
SnapshotGovernance—After Successful DAO Vote, Uniswap Moves Forward with Phase 1 of $gUNI Distribution — Failed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK] - Tally Uniswap Proposal — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Growth Program Trial — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK] - Onboarding Package for Lisk — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Accountability Committee S3 Elections — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Delegate Race Tiebreaker — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Approved Budgets Rebalancing — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—UAC Renewal S3 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] - Ethereum Foundation Attackathon Sponsorship — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Uniswap Delegate Reward Initiative - Cycle 2 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[REDO: Temp Check] Activate 2, 3, 4 bps fee tiers on Uniswap v3 on Base — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Activate 2, 3, 4 bps fee tiers on Uniswap v3 on Base — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK]- Revised - Uniswap Onboarding Package - OKX Chain — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Forse Analytics for Uniswap Revitalization and Growth Program — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[TEMP CHECK] Uniswap Onboarding Package - OKX Chain — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Uniswap Onboarding Package - Gnosis Chain — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Arbitrum LTIPP Matching — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Onboard Uniswap to Redstone — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Uniswap Delegate Reward -3 Months-Cycle 1 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—DeFi Education Fund Temp Check- Options — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—DeFi Education Fund Temp Check — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Treasury Working Group (UTWG) Election — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Uniswap Onboarding Package - Manta — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Update Uni v3/v2 Deployment Process (March 2024) — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Onboard Uniswap to Sei — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Mobilizing the Uniswap Treasury — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap V3 Fees: Factory Owner Amendment — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Activate Uniswap Protocol Governance — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Deploy Uniswap v3 on Zora — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp] Uni Onboarding Package - Mantle — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp] Uni Onboarding Package - BSC — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp] Uni Onboarding Package - Moonbeam — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp] Uni Onboarding Package - Taiko — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp] Uni Onboarding Package - Base — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp] Uni Onboarding Package - Linea — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp] Uni Onboarding Package - Blast — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp] Uni Onboarding Package - zkSync — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp] Uni Onboarding Package - Polygon zkEVM — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp] Uni Onboarding Package - Scroll — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Deployments Accountability Committee Competition — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Lower Onchain Proposal Threshold — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap v3 on Rootstock (Bitcoin Sidechain) — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap DAO Portal is Open, early registrants receive the 'Early Uni' Role & will be included in the $UNI snapshot — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap DAO Portal is Open, early registrants receive the 'Early Uni' Role & will be included in the $UNI snapshot — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap DAO Portal is Open, early registrants receive the 'Early Uni' Role & will be included in the $UNI snapshot — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap DAO Portal is Open, early registrants receive the 'Early Uni' Role & will be included in the $UNI snapshot — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—After a Successful DAO Vote, Uniswap decided to Launch the Phase 1 of the $gUNI (Uniswap Gold) Distribution — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap DAO Portal is Open, all early registrants receive the 'Early Uni' Role & will be included in the $UNI snapshot — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check]: Competition of Delegation of UNI to Active but Underrepresented Delegates — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check]: Delegation of UNI to Active but Underrepresented Delegates — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check]: Invest in Ekubo Protocol — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check - [Issue a Visa Card with Uniswap Logo ] — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—UAGP Team Election — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—UADP Team Election — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check]: Complete initial funding of the UF — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Friendly Fork of Uniswap V3; ZERO Protocol on Polygon zkEVM — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] - Deploy Uniswap V2 on all chains with V3 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap V3 on Scroll — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Migrate the Celo Uniswap V3 Factory Contract owner from Optics to Wormhole — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—ARB Distribution Proposal Poll — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap v3 on Fantom — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap v3 on Filecoin Virtual Machine (FVM) — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Making Protocol Fees Operational: Asset to be held in the treasury — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Making Protocol Fees Operational: Initial deployment chain — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Making Protocol Fees Operational: Fee options for V3 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap v3 on Base — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Deploy UniswapV3 on Linea — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap v3 on Moonbeam (2023) — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Post-BSL cross-chain deployment process and creation of new uniswap.eth subdomain — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap V3 Launch on zkEVM — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap V3 on Gnosis Chain — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap v3 onto Kava EVM Network — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap v3 on Avalanche — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check: Create Accoutability Committee — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus check- Uniswap DAO can help 80K UNI to Turkey to relief after the big earthquake disaster — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check - Uniswap helps t — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap DAO can help 80K UNI to Turkey to relief after the big earthquake disaster — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Enable 1bp Fee Tier for UniswapV3 on Arbitrum — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Which bridge should Uniswap v3 use for cross-chain governance messaging between Ethereum and BNB Chain? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Should Uniswap v3 be deployed to BNB Chain? 🦄 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Optimism-Uniswap LM Program: Update to LM Managers — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Optimism-Uniswap LM Program: Update to Incentivized Pools — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Community Governance Process Changes — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap V3 on Scroll testnet — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Consensus Check] Fix the Cross Chain Messaging Bridge on Arbitrum — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Fix the Cross Chain Messaging Bridge on Arbitrum — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Consensus Check] Deploy Uniswap V3 to Boba Network — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap V3 to Boba Network — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Optimism-Uniswap Protocol LM Program: Pool selection — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Optimism-Uniswap Protocol LM Program: Structure — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Consensus Check] Deploy Uniswap V3 to zkSync — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Should we deploy Uniswap v3 on Aurora? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap V3 to zkSync — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Consensus Check] Create the Uniswap Foundation — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Create the Uniswap Foundation — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Consensus Check] "Fee switch" Pilot for Three Pairs — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temp Check: "Fee switch" activation for ETH/USDC & USDC/USDT — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Should Uniswap provide Rage Trade with an additional use grant? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Consensus Check] - Enable 1bp Fee Tier on UniswapV3 Optimism(L2) — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Should the Uniswap community participate in the Protocol Guild Pilot? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Consensus Check] Should Uniswap v3 be deployed to Gnosis Chain? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Consensus Check] Deploy Uniswap V3 on Moonbeam — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temperature Check] Deploy Uniswap V3 on Moonbeam — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check - Should Uniswap add the 1bp fee tier to Polygon? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check - Should Uniswap v3 be deployed to Gnosis Chain? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temp Check - Should Uniswap add the 1bp fee tier to Polygon? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Consensus Check] Should we deploy Uniswap V3 on Celo? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Should we deploy Uniswap V3 on Celo? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check - Should Uniswap governance contribute funding to the Nomic Foundation? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Should Uniswap governance contribute funding to the Nomic Foundation? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Funding the Fee Switch Activation — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—How should Uniswap community support "Adopt unicorn on unicode" proposal — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check - Deploy Uniswap V3 on Harmony through an Additional Use Grant to Hermes DeFi — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check - Should Uniswap Provide Voltz with v3 Additional Use Grant — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check - Should Uniswap Provide Voltz with v3 Additional Use Grant? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check—Support izumi Finance as Uniswap V3 official partner of Liquidity Mining Platform — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Is uniswap supported to accelerate layer2? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus check - Should Uniswap incentivize liquidity on Optimism and Arbitrum? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check - Should Uniswap v3 be deployed to Polygon? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Should Uniswap v3 be deployed to Polygon? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check - Should Uniswap incentivize liquidity on Arbitrum and Optimism? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check - Should Uniswap incentivize Liquidity on Optimism and Arbitrum? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check - Add 1 Basis Point Fee Tier — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Should the DEF move its assets to a custodial wallet viewable on chain? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Should we deploy Uniswap V3 on AVAX? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check: Support $oneUNI Stablecoin — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check: Upgrade Governance Contract to Governor Bravo — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Begin Uniswap Liquidity Program v0.1 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Proposal] Removal of established cranial follicles fund. — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check: Upgrade Governance Contract to Governor Bravo — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check - Create Uniswap Volume KPI Options to help divest Uniswap’s Community Treasury into Stablecoins — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Turning on the fee switch for V2 — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check - ABOLISH Delegates and change the UNI Governance Voting System — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Should UGP be reinstated with existing funds? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check - [Merge the Uniswap Grant Program into Uniswap DAO Governance] — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check - Allocate 1.5M UNI to Go-Ethereum long-term Talent-Acquisition & Retention Grant (GETH-TARG) — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Create a CAPITAL PROTECTION Tool for v3!! — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check: Raise the proposal quorum threshold — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check: Community-Enabled Analytics via Yield-Generating Investment Strategies — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temp Check: Larger Grant Construct // CEA + No Negative Net UNI — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check: Raise the proposal quorum threshold — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Temperature Check - Managing Systemic Risk in Uniswap’s Community Treasury using KPI Options — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Consensus Check — Funding a Political Defense of DeFi — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Donate $50M worth of UNI to Chris Blec to leave DeFi for good — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Managing Systemic Risk in Uniswap's Community Treasury using KPI Options — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Should Uniswap lower the proposal submission threshold? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Funding a Political Defense of DeFi — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Deploy Uniswap v3 on Arbitrum — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Can UGP increase their Q2 budget to $1.5M? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Fund UNI Grants Program? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Consensus Check] Should Uniswap Distribute UNI to Liquidity Providers? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—[Temp Check] Should Uniswap Distribute UNI to Liquidity Providers? — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Liquidity mining continuation budget — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Uniswap Temperature check - [Should we increase the votingDelay?] — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Retroactive Airdrop For Proxy Contract Users (e.g. 1Inch, Dharma, Matcha, etc.) — Passed
SnapshotGovernance—Evidence: 0 commits in the last 90 days, 17 contributors, 0 releases in the last year.